Skip to main content

Table 1 Incremental and cumulative savings by country

From: Expanding molecular diagnostic coverage for tuberculosis by combining computer-aided chest radiography and sputum specimen pooling: a modeling study from four high-burden countries

 

Tests used

Incremental savings

Cumulative savings

N

N

%

N

%

Bangladesh

 Baseline approach

24,079

    

 CXR approach

11,448

12,631

52.5%

12,631

52.5%

 Indiscriminate pooling approach

11,676

− 228

− 2.0%

12,403

51.5%

 AI-guided pooling approach

9262

2414

20.7%

14,817

61.5%

Zambia

 Baseline approach

2353

    

 CXR approach

1960

393

16.7%

393

16.7%

 Indiscriminate pooling approach

1352

608

31.0%

1001

42.5%

 AI-guided pooling approach

1158

194

14.3%

1195

50.8%

Nigeria

 Baseline approach

1021

    

 CXR approach

738

283

27.7%

283

27.7%

 Indiscriminate pooling approach

459

279

37.8%

562

55.0%

 AI-guided pooling approach

434

25

5.4%

587

57.5%

Viet Nam

 Baseline approach

5074

    

 CXR approach

2917

2,157

42.5%

2157

42.5%

 Indiscriminate pooling approach

2110

807

27.7%

2964

58.4%

 AI-guided pooling approach

1955

155

7.3%

3119

61.5%

  1. CXR Chest X-ray, AI Artificial intelligence. Incremental savings are the test saved compared to the previous approach. Cumulative savings are the tests saved compared to the baseline approach